OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription
RankerModelsPlayground
OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription

One API to every speech-to-text model worth using. Compare them on your audio, route to the best one, pay per second.

Platform status

Product

RankerModelsTranscriptionsPlaygroundBlog

Developers

DocumentationReliabilityAPI VersioningStatus

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport
© 2026 OpenTranscription
Back to Models

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize vs Speechmatics Standard

2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize leads on raw accuracy; GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize is fastest; Speechmatics Standard covers the most languages; Speechmatics Standard is cheapest.

Open both in playground

Verdict · who wins what

Most accurate

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

14.6% WER

OpenAI

Fastest

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

0.2× realtime

OpenAI

Most languages

Speechmatics Standard

48 languages

Speechmatics

Cheapest

Speechmatics Standard

$0.0050/min

Speechmatics

Comparing

2 models · same benchmark

1

Batch

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

OpenAI

$0.0060/min
#12 · 50.7

GPT-4o transcription with built-in speaker diarization

Use This ModelDetails →

2

Batch

Speechmatics Standard

Speechmatics

$0.0050/min
#13 · 60.9

Cost-effective model — fast turnaround, 55+ languages

Use This ModelDetails →

Overview

30-day benchmark average

Overall score

0–100

50.7

60.9

Accuracy rank

of 35

#12

#13

Word error rate

WER

14.6%

14.7%

Character error rate

CER

10.0%

9.8%

Match error rate

MER

13.5%

13.8%

Word info lost

WIL

19.9%

19.3%

Languages

12

48

Cost vs. accuracy

overall WER vs price

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

Speechmatics Standard

field · 33 models

lower-left is better

Accuracy by category

WER · lower is better

code_switching

25.5%
54.2%

conversational

12.2%
7.3%

finance

6.3%

Accuracy by accent

WER · English

african

27.7%
13.9%

australian

29.2%
13.9%

indian

36.5%
6.3%

Speed & latency

p50 → p99

Processing speed

× realtime

0.2×

0.1×

Latency p50

17.2s

7.1s

Latency p90

18.1s

7.3s

Realtime / streaming

Streaming benchmark averages

Realtime rank

—

—

Realtime score

0–100

—

—

Time to first word

—

—

Final drain

—

—

Real-time factor

—

—

Flicker

—

—

Cadence

—

—

Reliability

Rolling 30 days

Uptime

100.00%

100.00%

Error rate

0.00%

0.00%

Pricing

billed per second

Rate

per minute

$0.0060

$0.0050

Billing granularity

per 1s

per 1s

1 hour of audio

$0.36

$0.30

100 hours

$36.00

Capabilities

Feature support

Speaker diarization

Yes

Yes

Word-level timestamps

No

Yes

Code-switching

No

Coverage & deployment

Languages · formats · regions

Languages

12

48

Mode

Batch

Batch

Region

United States

Europe

Audio formats

7.9%

general

14.5%
7.4%

legal

2.3%
4.0%

medical

1.9%
7.8%

noisy

32.5%
50.3%

technical

4.6%
4.6%

uk

13.4%
0.0%

us

18.9%
3.8%

Latency p99

18.1s

7.3s

$29.88

1,000 hours

$360.00

$298.80

Yes

Auto-detect language

Yes

Yes

Live / streaming

No

No

Custom vocabulary

No

Yes

mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm
mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg

Max file size

25 MB

1 GB

Max duration

No limit

No limit

Compliance

SOC2
GDPR
SOC2
GDPR

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Speechmatics Standard more accurate?

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize is more accurate, with a 14.6% word error rate versus 14.7% for Speechmatics Standard, on our standardized benchmark.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Speechmatics Standard?

Speechmatics Standard is cheaper at $0.0050/min versus $0.0060/min for GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize.

Should you choose GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Speechmatics Standard?

Choose GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize for accuracy and speed; choose Speechmatics Standard for lower cost and language coverage.