OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription
RankerModelsPlayground
OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription

One API to every speech-to-text model worth using. Compare them on your audio, route to the best one, pay per second.

Platform status

Product

RankerModelsTranscriptionsPlaygroundBlog

Developers

DocumentationReliabilityAPI VersioningStatus

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport
© 2026 OpenTranscription
Back to Models

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize vs Speechmatics Enhanced

2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Speechmatics Enhanced leads on raw accuracy; Speechmatics Enhanced is fastest; Speechmatics Enhanced covers the most languages; GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize is cheapest.

Open both in playground

Verdict · who wins what

Most accurate

Speechmatics Enhanced

12.3% WER

Speechmatics

Fastest

Speechmatics Enhanced

0.3× realtime

Speechmatics

Most languages

Speechmatics Enhanced

48 languages

Speechmatics

Cheapest

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

$0.0060/min

OpenAI

Comparing

2 models · same benchmark

1

Batch

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

OpenAI

$0.0060/min
#12 · 50.7

GPT-4o transcription with built-in speaker diarization

Use This ModelDetails →

2

Batch

Speechmatics Enhanced

Speechmatics

$0.0083/min
#6 · 47.3

Highest accuracy model — 55+ languages, best-in-class

Use This ModelDetails →

Overview

30-day benchmark average

Overall score

0–100

50.7

47.3

Accuracy rank

of 35

#12

#6

Word error rate

WER

14.6%

12.3%

Character error rate

CER

10.0%

8.0%

Match error rate

MER

13.5%

11.3%

Word info lost

WIL

19.9%

16.2%

Languages

12

48

Cost vs. accuracy

overall WER vs price

Speechmatics Enhanced

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

field · 33 models

lower-left is better

Accuracy by category

WER · lower is better

code_switching

25.5%
39.2%

conversational

12.2%
6.4%

finance

6.3%

Accuracy by accent

WER · English

african

27.7%
7.7%

australian

29.2%
7.7%

indian

36.5%
9.5%

Speed & latency

p50 → p99

Processing speed

× realtime

0.2×

0.3×

Latency p50

17.2s

8.7s

Latency p90

18.1s

12.1s

Realtime / streaming

Streaming benchmark averages

Realtime rank

—

—

Realtime score

0–100

—

—

Time to first word

—

—

Final drain

—

—

Real-time factor

—

—

Flicker

—

—

Cadence

—

—

Reliability

Rolling 30 days

Uptime

100.00%

100.00%

Error rate

0.00%

0.00%

Pricing

billed per second

Rate

per minute

$0.0060

$0.0083

Billing granularity

per 1s

per 1s

1 hour of audio

$0.36

$0.50

100 hours

Capabilities

Feature support

Speaker diarization

Yes

Yes

Word-level timestamps

No

Yes

Code-switching

No

Coverage & deployment

Languages · formats · regions

Languages

12

48

Mode

Batch

Batch

Region

United States

Europe

Audio formats

6.8%

general

14.5%
7.2%

legal

2.3%
2.2%

medical

1.9%
5.7%

noisy

32.5%
40.8%

technical

4.6%
5.3%

uk

13.4%
3.0%

us

18.9%
1.9%

Latency p99

18.1s

12.1s

$36.00

$49.68

1,000 hours

$360.00

$496.80

Yes

Auto-detect language

Yes

Yes

Live / streaming

No

No

Custom vocabulary

No

Yes

mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm
mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg

Max file size

25 MB

1 GB

Max duration

No limit

No limit

Compliance

SOC2
GDPR
SOC2
GDPR

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Speechmatics Enhanced more accurate?

Speechmatics Enhanced is more accurate, with a 12.3% word error rate versus 14.6% for GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize, on our standardized benchmark.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Speechmatics Enhanced?

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize is cheaper at $0.0060/min versus $0.0083/min for Speechmatics Enhanced.

Should you choose GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize or Speechmatics Enhanced?

Choose GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize for lower cost; choose Speechmatics Enhanced for accuracy, speed, and language coverage.