OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription
RankerModelsPlayground
OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription

One API to every speech-to-text model worth using. Compare them on your audio, route to the best one, pay per second.

Platform status

Product

RankerModelsTranscriptionsPlaygroundBlog

Developers

DocumentationReliabilityAPI VersioningStatus

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport
© 2026 OpenTranscription
Back to Models

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe vs Speechmatics Enhanced

2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Speechmatics Enhanced leads on raw accuracy; Speechmatics Enhanced is fastest; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe covers the most languages; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is cheapest.

Open both in playground

Verdict · who wins what

Most accurate

Speechmatics Enhanced

12.3% WER

Speechmatics

Fastest

Speechmatics Enhanced

0.3× realtime

Speechmatics

Most languages

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

98 languages

OpenAI

Cheapest

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

$0.0030/min

OpenAI

Comparing

2 models · same benchmark

1

Batch

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

OpenAI

$0.0030/min
#9 · 81.1

GPT-4o Mini optimized for fast transcription

Use This ModelDetails →

2

Batch

Speechmatics Enhanced

Speechmatics

$0.0083/min
#6 · 47.3

Highest accuracy model — 55+ languages, best-in-class

Use This ModelDetails →

Overview

30-day benchmark average

Overall score

0–100

81.1

47.3

Accuracy rank

of 35

#9

#6

Word error rate

WER

13.6%

12.3%

Character error rate

CER

9.3%

8.0%

Match error rate

MER

12.8%

11.3%

Word info lost

WIL

17.8%

16.2%

Languages

98

48

Cost vs. accuracy

overall WER vs price

Speechmatics Enhanced

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

field · 33 models

lower-left is better

Accuracy by category

WER · lower is better

code_switching

18.6%
39.2%

conversational

12.4%
6.4%

finance

6.0%

Accuracy by accent

WER · English

african

29.2%
7.7%

australian

12.3%
7.7%

indian

20.6%
9.5%

Speed & latency

p50 → p99

Processing speed

× realtime

0.1×

0.3×

Latency p50

2.0s

8.7s

Latency p90

2.4s

12.1s

Realtime / streaming

Streaming benchmark averages

Realtime rank

—

—

Realtime score

0–100

—

—

Time to first word

—

—

Final drain

—

—

Real-time factor

—

—

Flicker

—

—

Cadence

—

—

Reliability

Rolling 30 days

Uptime

100.00%

100.00%

Error rate

0.00%

0.00%

Pricing

billed per second

Rate

per minute

$0.0030

$0.0083

Billing granularity

per 1s

per 1s

1 hour of audio

$0.18

$0.50

100 hours

Capabilities

Feature support

Speaker diarization

No

Yes

Word-level timestamps

Yes

Yes

Code-switching

No

Coverage & deployment

Languages · formats · regions

Languages

98

48

Mode

Batch

Batch

Region

United States

Europe

Audio formats

6.8%

general

11.2%
7.2%

legal

4.9%
2.2%

medical

3.5%
5.7%

noisy

40.8%
40.8%

technical

4.0%
5.3%

uk

7.5%
3.0%

us

18.9%
1.9%

Latency p99

2.4s

12.1s

$18.00

$49.68

1,000 hours

$180.00

$496.80

Yes

Auto-detect language

Yes

Yes

Live / streaming

No

No

Custom vocabulary

No

Yes

mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm
mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg

Max file size

25 MB

1 GB

Max duration

No limit

No limit

Compliance

SOC2
GDPR
SOC2
GDPR

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o Mini Transcribe or Speechmatics Enhanced more accurate?

Speechmatics Enhanced is more accurate, with a 12.3% word error rate versus 13.6% for GPT-4o Mini Transcribe, on our standardized benchmark.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini Transcribe or Speechmatics Enhanced?

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is cheaper at $0.0030/min versus $0.0083/min for Speechmatics Enhanced.

Should you choose GPT-4o Mini Transcribe or Speechmatics Enhanced?

Choose GPT-4o Mini Transcribe for lower cost and language coverage; choose Speechmatics Enhanced for accuracy and speed.