OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription
RankerModelsPlayground
OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription

One API to every speech-to-text model worth using. Compare them on your audio, route to the best one, pay per second.

Platform status

Product

RankerModelsTranscriptionsPlaygroundBlog

Developers

DocumentationReliabilityAPI VersioningStatus

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport
© 2026 OpenTranscription
Back to Models

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe vs GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. GPT-4o Mini Transcribe leads on raw accuracy; GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize is fastest; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe covers the most languages; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is cheapest.

Open both in playground

Verdict · who wins what

Most accurate

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

13.6% WER

OpenAI

Fastest

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

0.2× realtime

OpenAI

Most languages

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

98 languages

OpenAI

Cheapest

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

$0.0030/min

OpenAI

Comparing

2 models · same benchmark

1

Batch

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

OpenAI

$0.0030/min
#9 · 81.1

GPT-4o Mini optimized for fast transcription

Use This ModelDetails →

2

Batch

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

OpenAI

$0.0060/min
#12 · 50.7

GPT-4o transcription with built-in speaker diarization

Use This ModelDetails →

Overview

30-day benchmark average

Overall score

0–100

81.1

50.7

Accuracy rank

of 35

#9

#12

Word error rate

WER

13.6%

14.6%

Character error rate

CER

9.3%

10.0%

Match error rate

MER

12.8%

13.5%

Word info lost

WIL

17.8%

19.9%

Languages

98

12

Cost vs. accuracy

overall WER vs price

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

field · 33 models

lower-left is better

Accuracy by category

WER · lower is better

code_switching

18.6%
25.5%

conversational

12.4%
12.2%

finance

6.0%
6.3%

general

11.2%
14.5%

legal

4.9%
2.3%

medical

3.5%
1.9%

noisy

40.8%
32.5%

technical

4.0%
4.6%

Accuracy by accent

WER · English

african

29.2%
27.7%

australian

12.3%
29.2%

indian

20.6%
36.5%

uk

7.5%
13.4%

us

18.9%
18.9%

Speed & latency

p50 → p99

Processing speed

× realtime

0.1×

0.2×

Latency p50

2.0s

17.2s

Latency p90

2.4s

18.1s

Latency p99

2.4s

18.1s

Realtime / streaming

Streaming benchmark averages

Realtime rank

—

—

Realtime score

0–100

—

—

Time to first word

—

—

Final drain

—

—

Real-time factor

—

—

Flicker

—

—

Cadence

—

—

Reliability

Rolling 30 days

Uptime

100.00%

100.00%

Error rate

0.00%

0.00%

Pricing

billed per second

Rate

per minute

$0.0030

$0.0060

Billing granularity

per 1s

per 1s

1 hour of audio

$0.18

$0.36

100 hours

$18.00

$36.00

1,000 hours

$180.00

$360.00

Capabilities

Feature support

Speaker diarization

No

Yes

Word-level timestamps

Yes

No

Code-switching

No

No

Auto-detect language

Yes

Yes

Live / streaming

No

No

Custom vocabulary

No

No

Coverage & deployment

Languages · formats · regions

Languages

98

12

Mode

Batch

Batch

Region

United States

United States

Audio formats

mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm
mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm

Max file size

25 MB

25 MB

Max duration

No limit

No limit

Compliance

SOC2
GDPR
SOC2
GDPR

Frequently asked questions

Is GPT-4o Mini Transcribe or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize more accurate?

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is more accurate, with a 13.6% word error rate versus 14.6% for GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize, on our standardized benchmark.

Which is cheaper, GPT-4o Mini Transcribe or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize?

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is cheaper at $0.0030/min versus $0.0060/min for GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize.

Should you choose GPT-4o Mini Transcribe or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize?

Choose GPT-4o Mini Transcribe for accuracy, lower cost, and language coverage; choose GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize for speed.