OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription
RankerModelsPlayground
OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription

One API to every speech-to-text model worth using. Compare them on your audio, route to the best one, pay per second.

Platform status

Product

RankerModelsTranscriptionsPlaygroundBlog

Developers

DocumentationReliabilityAPI VersioningStatus

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport
© 2026 OpenTranscription
Back to Models

Gladia Solaria-3 vs GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Gladia Solaria-3 leads on raw accuracy; Gladia Solaria-3 is fastest; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe covers the most languages; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is cheapest.

Open both in playground

Verdict · who wins what

Most accurate

Gladia Solaria-3

9.8% WER

Gladia

Fastest

Gladia Solaria-3

0.2× realtime

Gladia

Most languages

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

98 languages

OpenAI

Cheapest

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

$0.0030/min

OpenAI

Comparing

2 models · same benchmark

1

Batch

Gladia Solaria-3

Gladia

$0.0101/min
#3 · 52.2

Gladia Solaria-3 — EU-hosted batch speech-to-text tuned for the most accurate business audio across five core European languages (English, French, German, Spanish, Italian), with speaker diarization, custom vocabulary, and word-level timestamps.

Use This ModelDetails →

2

Batch

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

OpenAI

$0.0030/min
#9 · 81.1

GPT-4o Mini optimized for fast transcription

Use This ModelDetails →

Overview

30-day benchmark average

Overall score

0–100

52.2

81.1

Accuracy rank

of 35

#3

#9

Word error rate

WER

9.8%

13.6%

Character error rate

CER

5.8%

9.3%

Match error rate

MER

9.6%

12.8%

Word info lost

WIL

14.7%

17.8%

Languages

5

98

Cost vs. accuracy

overall WER vs price

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe

Gladia Solaria-3

field · 33 models

lower-left is better

Accuracy by category

WER · lower is better

code_switching

24.8%
18.6%

conversational

7.0%
12.4%

finance

9.5%
6.0%

Accuracy by accent

WER · English

african

24.6%
29.2%

australian

13.9%
12.3%

indian

25.4%
20.6%

Speed & latency

p50 → p99

Processing speed

× realtime

0.2×

0.1×

Latency p50

7.6s

2.0s

Latency p90

7.7s

2.4s

Realtime / streaming

Streaming benchmark averages

Realtime rank

—

—

Realtime score

0–100

—

—

Time to first word

—

—

Final drain

—

—

Real-time factor

—

—

Flicker

—

—

Cadence

—

—

Reliability

Rolling 30 days

Uptime

100.00%

100.00%

Error rate

0.00%

0.00%

Pricing

billed per second

Rate

per minute

$0.0101

$0.0030

Billing granularity

per 1s

per 1s

1 hour of audio

$0.61

$0.18

100 hours

$60.84

Capabilities

Feature support

Speaker diarization

Yes

No

Word-level timestamps

Yes

Yes

Code-switching

No

Coverage & deployment

Languages · formats · regions

Languages

5

98

Mode

Batch

Batch

Region

EU (France)

United States

Audio formats

general

9.0%
11.2%

legal

2.9%
4.9%

medical

8.9%
3.5%

noisy

—

40.8%

technical

—

4.0%

uk

7.5%
7.5%

us

13.2%
18.9%

Latency p99

7.7s

2.4s

$18.00

1,000 hours

$608.40

$180.00

No

Auto-detect language

Yes

Yes

Live / streaming

No

No

Custom vocabulary

Yes

No

mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm
aac
mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm

Max file size

1000 MB

25 MB

Max duration

2 h 15 min

No limit

Compliance

GDPR
SOC2
GDPR

Frequently asked questions

Is Gladia Solaria-3 or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe more accurate?

Gladia Solaria-3 is more accurate, with a 9.8% word error rate versus 13.6% for GPT-4o Mini Transcribe, on our standardized benchmark.

Which is cheaper, Gladia Solaria-3 or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe?

GPT-4o Mini Transcribe is cheaper at $0.0030/min versus $0.0101/min for Gladia Solaria-3.

Should you choose Gladia Solaria-3 or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe?

Choose Gladia Solaria-3 for accuracy and speed; choose GPT-4o Mini Transcribe for lower cost and language coverage.