OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription
RankerModelsPlayground
OpenTranscription
OpenTranscription

One API to every speech-to-text model worth using. Compare them on your audio, route to the best one, pay per second.

Platform status

Product

RankerModelsTranscriptionsPlaygroundBlog

Developers

DocumentationReliabilityAPI VersioningStatus

Legal

Privacy PolicyTerms of ServiceSupport
© 2026 OpenTranscription
Back to Models

Scribe v2 vs GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Scribe v2 leads on raw accuracy; Scribe v2 covers the most languages; Scribe v2 is cheapest.

Open both in playground

Verdict · who wins what

Most accurate

Scribe v2

9.2% WER

ElevenLabs

Fastest

—

—

Most languages

Scribe v2

76 languages

ElevenLabs

Cheapest

Scribe v2

$0.0040/min

ElevenLabs

Comparing

2 models · same benchmark

1

Batch

Scribe v2

ElevenLabs

$0.0040/min
#2 · 78.2

State-of-the-art batch STT — 90+ languages, speaker diarization, audio tagging

Use This ModelDetails →

2

Batch

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

OpenAI

$0.0060/min
#12 · 50.7

GPT-4o transcription with built-in speaker diarization

Use This ModelDetails →

Overview

30-day benchmark average

Overall score

0–100

78.2

50.7

Accuracy rank

of 35

#2

#12

Word error rate

WER

9.2%

14.6%

Character error rate

CER

7.2%

10.0%

Match error rate

MER

8.5%

13.5%

Word info lost

WIL

12.3%

19.9%

Languages

76

12

Cost vs. accuracy

overall WER vs price

GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize

Scribe v2

field · 33 models

lower-left is better

Accuracy by category

WER · lower is better

code_switching

14.6%
25.5%

conversational

7.6%
12.2%

finance

7.6%
6.3%

Accuracy by accent

WER · English

african

21.5%
27.7%

australian

3.1%
29.2%

indian

9.5%

Speed & latency

p50 → p99

Processing speed

× realtime

0.2×

0.2×

Latency p50

3.4s

17.2s

Latency p90

4.0s

18.1s

Realtime / streaming

Streaming benchmark averages

Realtime rank

—

—

Realtime score

0–100

—

—

Time to first word

—

—

Final drain

—

—

Real-time factor

—

—

Flicker

—

—

Cadence

—

—

Reliability

Rolling 30 days

Uptime

100.00%

100.00%

Error rate

0.00%

0.00%

Pricing

billed per second

Rate

per minute

$0.0040

$0.0060

Billing granularity

per 1s

per 1s

1 hour of audio

$0.24

$0.36

100 hours

Capabilities

Feature support

Speaker diarization

Yes

Yes

Word-level timestamps

Yes

No

Code-switching

Yes

Coverage & deployment

Languages · formats · regions

Languages

76

12

Mode

Batch

Batch

Region

United States

United States

Audio formats

general

5.4%
14.5%

legal

2.8%
2.3%

medical

5.8%
1.9%

noisy

33.8%
32.5%

technical

3.1%
4.6%
36.5%

uk

0.0%
13.4%

us

0.0%
18.9%

Latency p99

4.0s

18.1s

$24.12

$36.00

1,000 hours

$241.20

$360.00

No

Auto-detect language

Yes

Yes

Live / streaming

No

No

Custom vocabulary

No

No

mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
aac
mp3
wav
flac
m4a
ogg
webm

Max file size

3 GB

25 MB

Max duration

10 h

No limit

Compliance

SOC2
GDPR
SOC2
GDPR

Frequently asked questions

Is Scribe v2 or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize more accurate?

Scribe v2 is more accurate, with a 9.2% word error rate versus 14.6% for GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize, on our standardized benchmark.

Which is cheaper, Scribe v2 or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize?

Scribe v2 is cheaper at $0.0040/min versus $0.0060/min for GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize.

Should you choose Scribe v2 or GPT-4o Transcribe Diarize?

Scribe v2 is the stronger choice overall, leading on accuracy, lower cost, and language coverage.