2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Amazon Transcribe leads on raw accuracy; Amazon Transcribe is fastest; Amazon Transcribe covers the most languages; Amazon Transcribe is cheapest.
Verdict · who wins what
Most accurate
Amazon Transcribe
13.0% WER
Amazon Web Services
Fastest
Amazon Transcribe
0.4× realtime
Amazon Web Services
Most languages
Amazon Transcribe
77 languages
Amazon Web Services
Cheapest
Amazon Transcribe
$0.0060/min
Comparing
2 models · same benchmark
1
Amazon Transcribe
Amazon Web Services
AWS foundation model-powered ASR — 100+ languages
2
Google Command & Search
Google Cloud
Optimized for short queries and voice commands
30-day benchmark average
overall WER vs price
Google Command & Search
Amazon Transcribe
field · 26 models
lower-left is better
WER · lower is better
WER · English
p50 → p99
Streaming benchmark averages
Rolling 30 days
billed per second
Feature support
Languages · formats · regions
general
legal
medical
noisy
technical
uk
us
Latency p99
13.0s
12.7s
$36.00
$96.12
1,000 hours
$360.00
$961.20
No
Auto-detect language
Yes
No
Live / streaming
No
No
Custom vocabulary
No
No
Compliance
Amazon Web Services
Is Amazon Transcribe or Google Command & Search more accurate?
Amazon Transcribe is more accurate, with a 13.0% word error rate versus 35.2% for Google Command & Search, on our standardized benchmark.
Which is cheaper, Amazon Transcribe or Google Command & Search?
Amazon Transcribe is cheaper at $0.0060/min versus $0.0160/min for Google Command & Search.
Should you choose Amazon Transcribe or Google Command & Search?
Amazon Transcribe is the stronger choice overall, leading on accuracy, speed, lower cost, and language coverage.
