2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Qwen3 ASR Flash leads on raw accuracy; Speechmatics Standard covers the most languages; Qwen3 ASR Flash is cheapest.
Verdict · who wins what
Most accurate
Qwen3 ASR Flash
12.3% WER
Alibaba (Qwen)
Fastest
—
—
Most languages
Speechmatics Standard
48 languages
Speechmatics
Cheapest
Qwen3 ASR Flash
$0.0021/min
Alibaba (Qwen)
Comparing
2 models · same benchmark
1
Qwen3 ASR Flash
Alibaba (Qwen)
Alibaba Qwen3-ASR Flash — multilingual batch transcription (25+ languages) with word-level timestamps and automatic language detection, served from Model Studio (Singapore). Handles files up to 12 hours.
2
Speechmatics Standard
Speechmatics
Cost-effective model — fast turnaround, 55+ languages
Qwen3 ASR Flash
Speechmatics Standard
field · 33 models
lower-left is better
general
legal
medical
noisy
technical
uk
us
Latency p99
7.0s
7.3s
$12.60
$29.88
1,000 hours
$126.00
$298.80
Yes
Auto-detect language
Yes
Yes
Live / streaming
No
No
Custom vocabulary
No
Yes
Max file size
2 GB
1 GB
Max duration
12 h
No limit
Compliance
—
Is Qwen3 ASR Flash or Speechmatics Standard more accurate?
Qwen3 ASR Flash is more accurate, with a 12.3% word error rate versus 14.7% for Speechmatics Standard, on our standardized benchmark.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 ASR Flash or Speechmatics Standard?
Qwen3 ASR Flash is cheaper at $0.0021/min versus $0.0050/min for Speechmatics Standard.
Should you choose Qwen3 ASR Flash or Speechmatics Standard?
Choose Qwen3 ASR Flash for accuracy and lower cost; choose Speechmatics Standard for language coverage.
