2 models compared on the same benchmark — accuracy, latency, price, language coverage and capabilities. Qwen3 ASR Flash leads on raw accuracy; GPT-4o Mini Transcribe covers the most languages; Qwen3 ASR Flash is cheapest.
Verdict · who wins what
Most accurate
Qwen3 ASR Flash
12.3% WER
Alibaba (Qwen)
Fastest
—
—
Most languages
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
98 languages
OpenAI
Cheapest
Qwen3 ASR Flash
$0.0021/min
Alibaba (Qwen)
Comparing
2 models · same benchmark
1
Qwen3 ASR Flash
Alibaba (Qwen)
Alibaba Qwen3-ASR Flash — multilingual batch transcription (25+ languages) with word-level timestamps and automatic language detection, served from Model Studio (Singapore). Handles files up to 12 hours.
2
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
OpenAI
GPT-4o Mini optimized for fast transcription
GPT-4o Mini Transcribe
Qwen3 ASR Flash
field · 33 models
lower-left is better
general
legal
medical
noisy
technical
uk
us
Latency p99
7.0s
2.4s
$12.60
$18.00
1,000 hours
$126.00
$180.00
No
Auto-detect language
Yes
Yes
Live / streaming
No
No
Custom vocabulary
No
No
Max file size
2 GB
25 MB
Max duration
12 h
No limit
Compliance
—
Is Qwen3 ASR Flash or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe more accurate?
Qwen3 ASR Flash is more accurate, with a 12.3% word error rate versus 13.6% for GPT-4o Mini Transcribe, on our standardized benchmark.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3 ASR Flash or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe?
Qwen3 ASR Flash is cheaper at $0.0021/min versus $0.0030/min for GPT-4o Mini Transcribe.
Should you choose Qwen3 ASR Flash or GPT-4o Mini Transcribe?
Choose Qwen3 ASR Flash for accuracy and lower cost; choose GPT-4o Mini Transcribe for language coverage.
